Showing posts with label Tactics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tactics. Show all posts

Monday, January 8, 2018

Testing the Test

Today I stumbled across the website Elometer.net. Here's how they sum it up:
Dear chess friend,
we kindly invite you to the Elometer if you are interested in a quick measurement of your chess skills!

To obtain a psychometrically founded estimate of your playing strength based on a comparison sample of previous participants, all you have to do is to solve the following 76 chess problems.

...

In all of the following positions, you are playing White, and White is to move. Note, however, that the best move is not necessarily a brilliant one. Some of the following positions are rather simple, but some are very tough. Just try to choose the move you would play in a real game, and refrain from only trying to find a combination; this will yield the most precise estimate of your Elo rating.

The Elometer is part of a research project conducted by Birk Diedenhofen and Jochen Musch from the University of Duesseldorf, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Germany.
It took me a couple of hours to get through the test, but that was with stops due to supervising a 7 year-old. I would recommend doing it on a desktop computer instead of a tablet (as I did) or a phone, as that will minimize finger slips.

How'd I do? They estimated my rating at 2200 with a 95% confidence interval of about 2065 to 2330. Oops! Well, it isn't 100% confidence, is it? The format of the test also kept me from my usual errors of transposing moves and dropping random pieces, so I know where the 400 point difference is, alas.

Also of interest in a 48 position endgame test. All you have to do is state if White, with the move, can force a win in the given positions. I got 39 of 48 correct. Give them a try, and let me know how you did in the comments. The endgame tests include lots of basic stuff as well as more advanced material, such as the famous Cohn-Rubinstein ending from the St. Petersburg tournament of 1909, and Euwe's famous 1940 study of the pawn skeleton from the Ruy Lopez Exchange Variation. (Yes, I recognized both of those without having to look them up, although I did need to double check dates.)

I found the endgame studies interesting enough to enter them into a ChessBase database for further testing in the future. Aiming for no less than 48 out of 48.

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Analysis Time

Here's a tweet from FM Carsten Hansen.


The first two or three moves suggest themselves. Then it gets harder. Add your analysis in the comments, and I'll post the correct line later.

ANALYSIS can be found here.

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

A pattern worth remembering

@HowardStaunton does it again, this time highlighting a position from the current British Championships. (Link to Chess24.com.)


Mr. Staunton writes:
White has played with great skill, but here he by no means makes the most of his advantage.
White took a draw here. Can you see what he missed? Answer below the fold, in white font.

Monday, July 11, 2016

Tactics Time: Capablanca-Alekhine

Below is a position from the 29th game of the 1927 World Championship match between Capablanca and Alekhine. Capablanca had just played 21 Qb3!

Capablanca-Alekhine
World Championship Match (29)

Clearly, Alekhine would be happy to liquidate his b- & c-pawns for White's b- & d-pawns. However, he did not play 21...c5. Can you see why? (Answer in white-font below the fold.)

Monday, July 4, 2016

And now a game that just happens to be completely INSANE!

(Fans of Beavis & Butt-head will know the tone of voice I'm going for!)

I'm once again working my way through Lars Bo Hansen's book, Foundations of Chess Strategy. In the notes to the game Korchnoi-Kasparov, Lucerne (OL) 1982, Hansen mentions the rather insane game Hulak-Nunn, Toluca IZ 1982. About this game Hansen writes,
I refrain from trying to attach any signs or evaluations to this hyper-complicated outing....
He's not kidding! I'll post the whole game below (along with a few brief notes), but I want to call attention to one position in particular:

Hulak-Nunn, Toluca IZ 1982

Black has just played 32...R(a7)a8. As I looked at the position I started wondering why the sequence 33 Qh6 Rg8 34 Rf3, with the idea of Rf3-g3-g4-h4 wouldn't work. The best I came up with was 34...Qa1 35 Rg3 Bd4 36 Bxd4 Qxd4 37 Rg4 Ra1 38 Qxh7+ Kxh7 39 Rh4#

I'll leave it to the reader to figure out where I went wrong (several places, in fact), or you can check the notes below. The whole game is crazy, I highly recommend it!

Friday, July 1, 2016

A violent attack!

So nice to be on a chess blog where that title means something good has happened!